Film

Review: Crisis Falls Short with Multiple Storylines and Little to Surprise in Any of Them

Sometimes, it’s absolutely possible to make too much movie for one subject matter. The gold standard for films about the scope and damage of the drug trade has always been Steven Soderbergh’s Traffic, and the ambition behind writer/director Nicholas (Arbitrage) Jarecki’s Crisis is similar to that Oscar-winning effort. With multiple story lines all feeding into and weaving through each other, Crisis narrows its focus into the shady world of opioids, which are legal with a prescription but are almost immediately manufactured illegally by cartels and sold to those not in possession of a doctor’s note. There are also doctors willing to write a seemingly infinite number of prescriptions for money, putting the real thing on the street. There’s a reason they call it an “opioid crisis,” because there’s a seemingly endless supply of the stuff, and it’s highly addictive and potentially deadly.

Crisis

Image courtesy of the film.

Crisis attacks the issue from multiple angles, beginning with a DEA agent (Armie Hammer) posing as a drug trafficker who is putting together a Fentanyl deal that will, if successful, create a supply chain from Canada to the U.S. and will bring down multiple cartels. Perhaps fueled by his desire to get these drugs off the street, he also has a dug-addicted sister (Lily-Rose Depp) who drifts in and out of rehab in a way that is destroying his family. We also meet architect Claire Reimann (Evangeline Lilly), a former Oxycodone addict whose teenage son turns up dead of an Oxy overdose, despite his never showing signs that he ever took a drug in his life, let alone such a dangerous one. With no substantial help from the police, her own investigation into her son’s death sends her careening toward Hammer’s fragile set up and threatens to derail his work.

The final and most interesting segment of the film involves university professor and independent drug researcher Dr. Tyrone Brower (Gary Oldman), whose team is doing clinical trials on a new drug that is being marketed by the pharmaceutical giant that created it as the world’s first non-addictive painkiller. The company’s main representative (Luke Evans) supplies a great deal of money to the university in order to secure their seal of approval. The problem is, Dr. Brower’s team discovers that the drug is, in fact, addictive and deadly, but that it takes slightly longer for the patient to become addicted than current opioids. When he brings his findings to the dean of the school (Greg Kinnear), he’s pressured to sign off on the drug anyway and ignore his own findings—with a handsome cash reward if he does so. The pressure is on since the drug is set to go to market—having already received FDA approval. Does he do what’s in the financial interest of his university, or does he turn whistleblower?

There’s no denying the cast of Crisis is superior. There is fantastic supporting work from the likes of Michelle Rodriguez, Martin Donovan, Kid Cudi, Veronica Ferres, and Indira Varma, some of whom are great despite their roles barely registering in terms of screen time—Rodriguez most notably. But the real issue is that the DEA agent storyline and the one involving the grieving mother don’t give us anything we haven’t seen in other movies, and they certainly don’t add anything new to the way this type of story is told. At least the Oldman storyline might have been more compelling as a standalone film, since it seems the most topical in a time when there is a school of thought that a certain crop of vaccines were pushed through the approval process in a hurry.

These three stories don’t so much intersect as they do bump into each other sloppily, with the Oldman storyline barely grazing the other two. But instead of showing us the intrinsic harm opioids are doing to our world, Jarecki uses the subject as an excuse to fill the world with more cardboard cut-out drug dealers, each of them acting scary but not really doing much to convince us they’re any more dangerous than Armie Hammer’s DEA agent on a bad night. There is some suspense and a little action, but for the most part, the only tension the film generates involves people pursuing Oldman, digging up old allegations against him and working to discredit him as a researcher and human being. All told, Crisis is a whole-heartedly average endeavor about a very serious subject, one that it never quite gets to the heart of.

The film is now playing in select theaters and will be available via VOD beginning March 5.

Did you enjoy this post? Please consider supporting Third Coast Review’s arts and culture coverage by making a donation. Choose the amount that works best for you, and know how much we appreciate your support! 

1 reply »

  1. You say the issue of the grieving mother and the DEA agent storyline, “don’t give us anything we haven’t seen in other movies”. They don’t add anything new. Many award movies don’t add anything new. However, this grieving mother, I have not seen in other movies. Maybe you can cite one. Here is a professional, educated woman raising her child. She is capable and knows how to use a gun. I know many women who know how to do that. What movie has this lady been in? Can you say? We have seen movies with DEA agents, many. But we don’t give them a 2 star rating because of it. Especially not when Ms. Lily’s performance was at least 4 stars.

    “Bump into each other”, Is there a rule that says a multi plot movie is only 2 stars if the characters don’t exist in the same world where they collide? There were many lines that did not intersect in Traffic. So many reviews refer to Traffic, but not sure the reviewers remember it’s story very well. Zeta Jones, a totally innocent character in Traffic, becomes a rabid killer once her family is endangered. Yet you say Lily’s character is fake.

    “Don’t show us the intrinsic harm opioids are doing to our world”. By intrinsic, you mean essential?

    But CRISIS does show you. It shows you Claire, addicted from an injury, a recovering architect.(the drug affects all classes). It shows you Lily Rose Depp, a youngster who cannot cope. It shows you addicted homeless people and the scammers who prey on them. It shows you rehab where Lily Rose Depp has lost 60% of hearing in her right ear. Please don’t say you knew that opioid abuse causes irreversible hearing loss. You learned it from CRISIS. It shows you Big Pharma and how they get away with it.

    You close with “instead of showing us the “intrinsic harm” opioids are doing, Jarecki uses the subject to give us cardboard characters. You further say the moves from one world to the other are sloppy.

    I think the moves (the cutting from one word to the other) were deft and well done, careful not to jar, they were successful. i think the stories dovetailed nicely in the end and the ending itself leaves a ray of hope. The screenplay is coherent and tight.

    I’d say” all told” your review is a decidedly less than average endeavor at film criticism. Worst of all, your sloppy writing harms people.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *